Everything Wrong with Cold Case JFK in 1 Post

Today we're going to mark the 50th anniversary of the assassination of John F. Kennedy by doing something we generally don't do here at Raving Reviews - getting serious. We decided to do this after watching the PBS Nova documentary; Cold Case JFK (you can watch it at that link). Now, generally we have nothing but the highest respect for both Nova as a series and PBS in general, but this show was downright awful and we're going to document just how strange it was by pointing out all the things that are wrong with it (and in using the term we're borrowing from the now very famous Youtube.com series Cinema Sins). We figured that if the logic behind movies can be attacked, why not use the same approach to question a documentary? Plus much of the rest of the evidence we're going to look at comes from youtube.com - something we didn't have not so long ago.

It's not our goal here to speculate as to who may have actually committed the assassination (whether it was a lone gunman or conspiracy is the key question). It's our goal to assess whether this documentary accurately applied its investigative approach towards helping to solve the mystery.

Please note that the picture from show highlights a problem with trajectory...

The documentary opens with  promise to use the latest forensic science to get to the bottom of the assassination. They mention that the majority of their focus will be on ballistics. The main questions that the show asks falls into the following categories:

1. What type of wound does the Carcano rifle produce in soft tissue?
2. What type of head wound would a Carcano rifle produce?
3. Is the magic bullet theory accurate?
4. Was there audio evidence of another shooter?
5. What are the realistic trajectories of (possible) different shooters?

Before we start, keep these things in mind:

• There were two official investigations, The Warren Commission (mid-60's) and the United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) in 1978 - the HSCA was initiated as the result of the release of the Zapruder film.
• There are two well-known films of the assassination (the Zapruder film and the Muchmore film). There were as many as 20 other home movies made that day in Dealey Plaza.
• There is at least one audio recording (which was examined in the congressional investigation).

There are many, many details associated with the assassination that the documentary does not attempt address; some background information is presented but not in any kind of organized fashion. We will not address most of those issues either.

Enhanced view of Zapruder film

Here are the problems we found with the film:

• The film interviews the Secret Service agent who jumped on the back of the President's limo to cover Kennedy and the First Lady. He describes having to cover the President's head in order so that the first Lady will let him go at the hospital - yet the film fails to ask the unbelievably critical question - what did the head wound look like?

• The film does not mention anything about what the Dallas ER doctors saw while treating the President and examining him after his death. 

This is how the surgeon at Parkland hospital described Kennedy's head wound. It shows an exit in the back of the head. 

• Here's the quote from Dr. McCelland (who treated Kennedy at Parkland) - "I was about 18 inches above that wound. I got a better look at it than anybody in that room. It was way back in the back (of the head), which may lead to the thought that he was shot not only from the back, but also from the front.”  This is never mentioned in the show.

• The film does not attempt to find rifle experts with expertise shooting the Carcano 6.5 rifle in question. There is no mention made of the rifle's poor reputation. You would think that given this show's focus on ballistics there'd be more discussion about the rifle.

Oswald  with the Carcano - no mention of how odd this photo was or the differences in the shadows

• The show does not present any history of the Carcano 6.5 rifle Model 38 Fucile Modello 91/38 - other than stating it was a military rifle with full-metal jacket. The history of the Carcano is very, very complicated. This discussion also highlights that the Carcano was nowhere near as accurate as the M14 sniper rifle and very difficult to fire quickly. It was originally meant to be used a Calvary rifle - it was modified to be used as a short carbine with limited accuracy at a distance (testimony given during the Warren Commission was misleading in this regard). Also, worth noting all of the remarkable characteristics that the ballistics experts in the Nova program seemingly discover on their own are widely known and available in other websites describing the history of the gun. The particular model Oswald used was produced in 1940 and production was discontinued in less than 1 year (in favor of another model). Read this testimony from people at the firing range where Oswald practiced - note the discussion of the odd "ball of fire" coming out of the barrel. Now, this is interesting because of all the eyewitness testimony in both official investigations, the only reports of a flash (like the one that might be produced from a gun muzzle upon firing) was seen coming from the Grassy Knoll. If 3 shots had been fired from the book depository building, why did no one see flashes from there - and from the same gun that other witnesses at the firing range said produced flashes?

View from 3rd floor of Dal-Tex building (straight line trajectory - no trees) - multiple reports place a gunman there

• The show mentions how incredibly unusual the rifle was (there was no evidence of it ever being used in a crime before in the U.S.), but doesn't ask the question why someone would want it (except by stating it was cheap - so we're given to believe it was chosen because it cost $19.99 in a mail order magazine). It is worth noting, that even though the rifle itself was cheap, the ammunition for it was not (and was very hard to come by at that time). The lack of attention to or examination of the rifle itself by the film / investigators is beyond strange (they only focus on the ammunition, but even that isn't done thoroughly). How can you have a ballistics investigation and not talk about the gun??? [and BTW - they never mention if the 'pristine' bullet found on the stretcher in Parkland Memorial Hospital matched tests done on firing bullets from the actual (retrieved Carcano pictured below) gun - this is the most basic component of any forensic ballistics investigation]. 

The Carcano 6.5 we're told fired the shots in Dealey Plaza - note that it's a Carbine (short rifle)

• Almost no discussion is made regarding the time it takes to recycle the rifle (see video 2) between shots. Nor is there mention of what it might be like to try to use the scope under those (rapid fire) conditions. 

• The show's investigators, supposedly a bunch of brilliant forensic experts, fail to ask basic questions time and time again about the actual shooting - instead of their mocked up tests. For example, never once do they address why Oswald if he was the lone shooter, didn't take any shots at the President's limo while it was on Houston Street before turning onto Elm. This shot would have provided Oswald with a direct line of sight and no trees to obstruct it. 

Note that the right corner 6th floor window of the book depository provided nearly a straight angle shot onto Houston Street

• There's no mention that Oswald bought the gun in March of 1963. Oswald moved to Dallas in late 1962. How could he be planning for an assassination attempt in March given the Dallas JFK trip wasn't announced until September?

• Very strangely, the show doesn't not mention that the Warren Commission claims that Oswald using the same rifle from Nov 22, tried to assassinate Gen Edwin Walker in Dallas on April 10 (just weeks after the gun arrived). According to the Warren Commission two suspects were involved and importantly, they missed the General who was sitting stationary at his desk. Ballistics tests done later seem to confirm it was the same gun. Please remember that all the shots at Dealey Plaza were taken at moving targets. 

• The General Walker story is even more bizarre when you consider that the JFK administration had charged him with treason, arrested him and put him in a mental facility prior to the Dallas visit - and were afraid his followers in Dallas were a security threat. So why did Oswald try to kill someone JFK considered an enemy of the state?

Excellent photo showing the relative position of the limo just before the shots were fired, Book Depository (left behind trees) and the Dal-Tex building (directly behind the limo with a straight and flat line of sight)

• Lot's of inane and irrelevant details are paraded in the show - such as the Secret Service breaking off the handles of the President's casket, etc.

• While discussing the autopsy at Bethesda Naval hospital does not address the controversy about the back of the President's head (which was mentioned by the doctors at Parkland hospital - e.g. that there was a large exit would in the back of the head). They don't mention anything about the possibility that the scalp may have been placed back over the wound (there's been a lot of discussion about that ever since the autopsy photos were made public). 

• The show does mention that that the autopsy doctors noted that the 1st shot that went from the back through the throat came from behind not above. This is critical.

• The show neither acknowledges or shows the other home movies taken of the assassination.

• They mention that Kennedy was given a Tracheotomy at Parkland Memorial hospital - no one asks why - they had just gotten through mentioning how much of his brains had been shot out - why do a Tracheotomy? 

• They do mention the 30 frame interval (1.6 seconds) in between the two main shots (Kennedy's shot that comes out of his throat and the fatal head shot). This is the reason given for the need for the magic bullet. Rather than questioning why anyone would go out of their way coming up with the Magic Bullet theory (e.g. trajectories and timing) they focus on trying to prove it instead.

• They show Kennedy's clothes and you can clearly see the bullet exited the left side of the tie (and shirt collar) - no mention is made of that. This is also important.

Clearly visible is an exit wound passing out the left side of the President's tie

• There is a very short section of the Zapruder film which seems to be missing - no one mentions it. It is when the limo rounds the corner onto Elm street - we see a jump cut to the limo about 50 feet down the road. It appears as though maybe 30 or so frames missing. Now, interestingly, in at least 3 other home movies we've seen so far taken of the motorcade passing through Dealey Plaza the section where the car turns onto Elm Street is either missing or damaged (the same spot where the missing Zapruder frames were). It begs the question, what happened during that interval? [this is important due to some reports that a first shot actually occurred at that point - one that likely missed).

• They mention that Kennedy is hit in frame 224 or 225 of the Zapruder film. Governor Connolly is only noticeably hit around frame 236. That's about a .3 second lag between the two hits. To give this context the film does mention that upon exiting the gun, a Carcano bullet travels at nearly 2100 feet per second. The distance between Kennedy and Connelly is perhaps 3 feet. Even at a 1000 feet per second, there shouldn't be any noticeable lag between the two hits (in what is called the magic bullet). Nowhere in the following Magic Bullet theory discussion do they spend any time exploring the inexplicable lag time between frame 224 and 235 or 236.

Note the relative position in the car of Kennedy and Connelly (left side of Kennedy's tie points to Connelly's left not right)

• They do mention how forensic specialists were not used to do the autopsy but don't make any statements regarding the experience or skills necessary for attorney Arlen Spector to have made his assertions about the Magic Bullet (his expertise or lack thereof is never called into question).

Arlen Spector's notes on the Magic Bullet - this is not shown in the film

• They acknowledge it takes 2.3 seconds to fire the Carcano 6.5, but never talk about whether someone could fire and aim it that fast.

Video 2 - Here's what firing a Carcano looks like

• Despite being able to clearly see the trees that potentially obscure a shot from the 6th floor of the book depository, it is never mentioned in the show. 

• Despite the documentary showing off gee-wiz laser mapping technology and trajectories, they never show or otherwise describe the trajectory from the window where Lee Harvey Oswald was supposed to taken the shots (just from the grassy knoll)

A map of Dealey Plaza and the parade route - note the relative positions of the buildings behind the route (the X's mark where the 2 shots identified b y the Warren Commission took place).

• While the show does examine, in a very cursory manner, questions about the Grassy Knoll, it doesn't in any way address any other possible shooting locations (such as the park between main street or the Dal-Tex building).

• The show does not include any eyewitness testimony (except for the testimony of Governor Connelly that he was hit by a 2nd bullet - the throat shot to Kennedy being the first - which does contradict the Warren commission findings which say the throat shot was second).

Listen for yourself to the actual witnesses...

• No discussion was made at all about the parade route. 

• They acknowledge that the Magic Bullet theory calls for 1 bullet causing seven wounds and still not showing much if any damage (the pristine bullet). They show the Carcano 6.5 shooting a bullet through 3 feet of pine wood. Then they're test show the bullet becomes lopsided as it exits a flesh like material. So, even if the bullet were to come out of Kennedy undamaged, hitting Connelly sideways at a lower velocity and passing through multiple bones should have produced some more deformation to the bullet. The film does not address the fact that the bullet passed through multiple bones in Connelly's wounds. So, their tests of passing through gelatin is not accurate for what happens when the bullet hits Connelly. They try to explain this by saying the bullet is actually quished a little (flattened sideways).  

• While they are showing the animated trajectories in their Magic Bullet discussion, they never show the full trajectory (where it emanates from - the window in the book depository).

View from 6th floor book depository window - note the view is partially obscured

• When showing the trajectory of Kennedy's neck wounds, the show inserts a diagram which seems to imply Kennedy was leaning forward - this helps to potentially line up with a sharp downward trajectory for a shot fired from the 6th floor of the book depository (because in Kennedy the entry wound in the back and exit wound in the front seem more or less level - or at least with a limited downward angle). 

Problem here - Kennedy was not facing down showing that the bullet could not have come from a steep angle above

• When looking at the diagrams from Governor Connelly's wounds it is clear that there is a sharp angle of descent. The bullet enters just under the right shoulder blade and exits just under his right breast. According to some diagrams it appears to be about a 30 degree angle (or 27.03). Not only that, but if we accept that Connelly was still sitting facing forward (which you can see as the limo emerges from the sign when Kennedy is first hit around frame 225 of the Zapruder film) then his right wrist was likely folded over his lap and thus the bullet was also coming from the side as opposed to being directly behind him. So, high angle and from the right side. For Kennedy, the same "Magic" bullet was on a relatively flat trajectory from behind and slightly to the right (hence the bullet leaving the left side of his shirt and tie).

A more accurate representation of the 30 degree trajectory Connelly's wounds

• So from the previous discussion - how could a bullet clearly coming flat from behind and heading left (say 15 degrees or more) enter Connelly 3 feet ahead of him under Connelly's right shoulder if Connelly was facing forward? And if the Kennedy bullet didn't actually hit Connelly - where did it go? The show never considers the possibility - even though it acknowledged Connelly himself saying he was hit by a later shot. Where did it go - well, if it was headed downward at 15 degrees and to the left of Kennedy then? There was no discussion about forensic examination of the Presidential limo - which for example might have shown a bullet lodged in the back of middle row or front row seats towards the center.

Governor Connelly's wounds.

• Nova goes out of the way to highlight that the ballistics expert endorses Arlen Spector's Single (Magic) Bullet theory after merely testing the Carcano 6.5 through gelatin and noting it's wobble upon exit (3 times). He makes no mention of any of the relative trajectories of the 7 wounds when making that endorsement.

The strange trajectory of the Magic Bullet. Proponents for Spector's theory try to make up for this by showing Connelly had already turned backwards even though the Zapruder shows he didn't until almost 1.5 seconds later.

• No mention was made of the fact that the limo was not properly searched for forensic evidence and was completely rebuilt beginning within 3 weeks of assassination in Cincinnati, Ohio. Thus it was not available for review by the Warren Commission (or anyone else) in its "assassination" condition.

• The strangest moment in the film is truly bizarre as they tackle the visual evidence that Kennedy's head was pushed backwards from a shot emanating most probably at the Grassy Knoll. They make the contention that the head shot triggered some sort of nerve cluster reaction that jolted the head and body backwards even though the entry wound supposedly came from behind. Yeah right... No evidence for this whatsoever is presented - just the preposterous theory. 

One of many eyewitness accounts regarding the direction of Head wound entry

• The show went out of their way to dismiss dozens of eyewitness accounts on the number of shots fired by stating that urban acoustics can make pinpointing locations of shots impossible.

Interesting examination of audio taken the day of the shooting plus eye-witnesses

• They dismiss the audio tape evidence without even playing the tape and then bring in an audio expert to do an audio test. They then say that the Carcano 6.5 would present two sounds for every shot - yet the audio tape evidence doesn't seem to indicated double shots. 

• The show identifies a drawing of Kennedy's brain as key evidence without disclosing who provided it (they just mention a commission). The real brain is lost of course and no one wanted to listen to the doctor who treated Kennedy or even ask the Secret Service agent what the back of his head looked like. Instead, we're being given a potentially self-serving and undocumented piece of evidence that may have been used to help cover up a conspiracy, not prove one. Yet, Nova doesn't disclose these issues. This is the primary evidence supporting a head entry wound from behind.

JFK Exhibit F-302 - The drawing the show says proves rear entry of the fatal head shot

• If you look at the x-ray they say is Kennedy's skull, they posit that a bullet entered the lower portion of the back of the head (causing fractures to radiate upwards) and then exited the front top. But, this seems entirely contrary with the notion of a trajectory pointed downward at the President from the book depository (say at a 25 degree angle). You can't have it both ways - if the shot came from behind it would have had to hit somewhere near the top of the head, right? And worse than than - it would have been heading downwards so it should have exited Kennedy's face, not the right portion of his forehead. (and again if you look at the diagrams they used to illustrate the trajectory, it shows Kennedy's head leaning forward - which we know it wasn't).

• So, again the show fails to connect trajectory and wound behavior or position of the subjects. Also, even in the film they show of the skull tests - the skull shot from behind is pushed dramatically -forward. The extended expert testimony Nova provides even emphasizes that the bullet is 'arching upwards' into the top of the head without any mention as to why or how the bullet could have entered from that low and from that angle. 

Nova ends the show basically saying that science has proven the Magic Bullet theory is correct (without having in any way done so) and that the testimony of one guy (who worked at the same lab that was trying to prove the Magic Bullet theory was correct) who says the backward movement of Kennedy's head was in fact some type of instantaneous seizure.

So, what should we think about this? Is it merely incompetence on the part of the people making the film or a deliberate attempt to obscure and otherwise confuse some very obvious facts:

1. Neither the show nor the commissions have yet been able to account for the lag time and change in trajectories for the 7 Magic Bullet wounds.
2. No one can explain (or even tried to in this show) how someone could take a very poor bolt action rifle and make those shots so quickly.
3. No one can properly explain the fatal head shot. 
4. No one has asked the obvious question about the Dal-Tex building - which when you look at photos is in a nearly straight line behind where the limo was driving. There were reports of shots fired from the 3rd floor of that building - that trajectory would be consistent with the Kennedy throat wound.  

No one has yet to properly explain what happened in Dealey Plaza that day 50 years ago this week. We may not know in our lifetimes what really occurred. However, Nova has done us a real disservice with this documentary by presenting such a sloppy investigation. It only serves to remind us of how poorly managed this cold case actually was.


Copyright 2013, Raving Reviews

#JFK
#JFK Assassination
#NOVA
#ColdCaseJFK

Read More

Apocalypse Then

What can we say about Apocalypse Now - well, quite a lot actually - which is why we bothered to write this post. We were watching Apocalypse Now Redux last night on AMC and it reminded us of what an incredible movie it really is (well, two movies as the Redux version adds a lot of content and makes some plot changes from the original).

Movie poster for Apocalypse Now with Brando head

Where do we start? Apocalypse Now was one of the most talked about movies of the late seventies. Francis Ford Coppola began the project in earnest right as Godfather II was being released (1974) and spent the next 5 years producing / directing it. That means the production for this movie was longer than the actual Korean war but still 3 or 4 years shy of how long the Vietnam War lasted. According to Wikipedia (and they never lie) apparently both Stephen Spielberg and George Lucas encouraged Coppola to make a Vietnam War movie. Perhaps this was a brilliant plot by them to keep Coppola busy and out of the theaters while they released mega-hits like Jaws and Star Wars. Those guys are pretty clever. Anyway, Coppola rose to the occasion and hired rightwingnut / filmmaker and friend John Millius (recall Red Dawn when the Cubans invade Colorado) to write the script. It was Millius's idea to pattern the movie after Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness.

BTW - if you weren't forced to read Heart of Darkness in High School or College consider reading it for fun - and then ask yourself why you ever thought it would be fun. 

We digress. The original title was supposed to be "The Psychedelic Soldier" and Millius was originally developing the film with Lucas for four years (hence the need to dump the project off to Coppola so he could make Star Wars). The next five years represented a hellish struggle to get the thing made and Coppola's wife even made a documentary about that called "Hearts of Darkness." Martin Sheen, who along with Marlon Brando starred in the film, suffered a major heart attack during filming and almost died (he was only 32 or so when it happened). Making the movie cost a fortune (much of which Coppola ponied up himself) and took its toll on everyone involved. Was it worth it?

The original trailer...

Our answer is an immediate and unqualified, hell yes. While Lucas and Spielberg were making movie magic with Jaws and Star Wars, Coppola created something entirely different; a visually magnificent indictment of the Vietnam War - and a cinema classic every bit as powerful as his previous work in the Godfather series. There's a lot more going in the movie, though, and much of that was due to Millius' more or less brilliant idea to base the script on Heart of Darkness. For those not acquainted with that book, it chronicles a man's journey up the Congo river (we think it's the Congo) in what was the Belgian Congo in the 1890's or so. The Congo was more or less Belgium's only colony and they exploited the heck out of it. By some estimates, as many as 5 million men, women and children were either worked to death or killed during Belgium's cruel tenure as colonial masters. There's a certain insanity to any colonial system and this one was crazier than most - Conrad (who was really Polish but shortened his name and wrote novels in English) captured this insanity well within his fictional tale. That insanity then became the major theme translated to the semi-fictional world of Coppola's Vietnam - and the topic of Colonialism drives much of the storyline within Redux.

Best ranting Hippie journalist award

The movie itself is iconic and unforgettable; the best way to chronicle this is through a list of great cinema moments captured in the film/s:

• The helicopter attack sequence playing Wagner
• The Playboy show in the middle of the jungle
• The lighted bridge
• Surfing on the beach while under mortar fire (and the Napalm one liner)
• The sacrificed  cow / assassination of Kurtz interplay
• Martin Sheen emerging from the water on his mission of death
• Pretty much anytime Dennis Hopper spoke
• Brando's (Kurtz's) diamond bullet in the forehead monologue
• The wacked army of Kurtz greeting the boat in their canoes
• The arrow attack (which was a scene right from the novel)
• The boat search and shootout
• The juxtaposition of ceiling fan and helicopter rotors
• Appropriately place use of Doors music
• The old head in the lap trick (which reminds us a little of the Godfather horse-head stunt)
• The tiger in the jungle scene

There's more of course, but those are the moments and images that stand out for us.

Best operatic helicopter attack ever

This is not to say that there weren't problems with the movie. At the time, much fun was had a Brando's expanse, oops, expense due to his large waistline. He was filmed in shadow and wearing shirts that helped to mask his enormous weight gain. There is a sequence in Redux where Sheen has to have dinner with a bunch of petulant Frenchmen who seem to whine relentlessly about losing their Vietnam War. Now this could have been an interesting twist given the focus on Colonialism both in the novel and movie - but it just comes off whiny. And the romantic encounters in the Redux version - all of them - come off a bit goofy and distracting. Perhaps in another 10 years Coppola will re-cut the movie one more time and get it perfect.

Best coming out of the mud bath spa assassin award

One thing we're certain of - part of the reason Charlie Sheen is so crazy is that he had to spend a year or so on the set of this film when he was just a wee tyke. Ironically, less than 10 years later he would himself star in the second most important Vietnam War movie ever made, Platoon. No one else has come close to telling the Vietnam story as well as either of those movies (the only one that maybe came close was Stanley Kubrick's Full Metal Jacket - but it wasn't in the same league despite the talent applied to it).

We will leave you with Jim Morrison's disturbing and hauntingly beautiful self-fulfilling prophecy.

The horror, the horror... (BTW - that came from the novel too).

A song perfectly matched to the movie ending 

Copyright 2013, Raving Reviews

#RavingReviews
#ApocalypseNow

Read More

White House Down vs. Olympus Has Fallen

Every few years or so we're treated to a unique Hollywood phenomenon - total movie plagiarism - with one film coming out a nearly complete replica of another within a year or so.  Now, this doesn't include films produced by the Asylum, which bases their entire business model on copycat productions (you might recall Abraham Lincoln versus the Zombies [an Aslyum pic] coming out just after Abraham Lincoln Vampire Killer which by the way came out just before Lincoln - Lincoln had a bad year in 2012).

  

No, in today's post we're addressing the major studios going head to head trying to copy each other verbatim. We'll do that by conducting a shoot-off between White House Down and Olympus Has Fallen while reminiscing about great copycat moments of the past. Now, there's another category of copycatting as well - that is copying great Foreign films and pretending they're American - we won't forget that today either.

First, we need to establish that plagiarism did in fact occur between the two movies somehow - now you might complain the following information represents spoilers - however in this case one movie was in fact a spoiler for the other...

Plot Element	White House Down	Olympus Has Fallen
Secret Service Hero	Channing Tatum	Gerard Butler
Secret Service Traitor	James Woods	Dylan McDermott
Cute Kid the the White House	Tatum's Daughter	President's Son
Irrelevant Wife 1	Travelling First Lady	Dead First Lady
Irrelevant Wife 2	Divorced bimbo mom	ER nurse wife
Bad Guys	Right WingNuts	North Koreans
Initial Assault	Janitorial Explosion Congress	Hercules Gunship Whitehouse Assault
Goofy Vice President	Some guy who gets blown up	Some guy who gets shot
Speaker of the House / President	Evil bald guy	Morgan Freeman
Black President (Obamaman)	Jamie Foxx	Morgan Freeman
Ineffective Rescue Attempt	Delta Team FX Helicopter Assault	Seal Team FX Helicoptor
Nuclear Annilation	Blowing up the MiddleEast	Blowing up the US
The PEOC	much smaller room	pretty cool room
Comc Relief	The Tour Guide	The whole movie?
Secret Service subplot	Can't get hired	Stuck on a desk after letting Irrelevant wife 1 plunge to her death
Wiping out the Secret Service	Not so many	100's are shot en masse
Blowing up the White House	averted by flag waving cute kid	indecisive Morgan Freeman, although half of the white house does blow up
Evil Genius Hacker	Lincoln's sidekick from Vampire Killer movie	Sexy evil korean hacker babes
Gratitous head smashing	provided by tour guide using an antique	Gerard Butler uses Lincoln's bust (poor Abe just can't get any relief)
Gratitous head stabbing	n/a	This is a Gerard only thing
Secret inside the whitehouse communications	Secret service phone, handheld	President's Satphone, with Blue tooth headset
Presidential Limo antics	Lawn job in the rose garden	driving off a bridge near camp David
Near World Collapse	everyone with nukes plus middle east	ditto
Cabinet Executions	Red Shirt Syndrome	Red Shirt Syndrome

White House Down

budget 150 million

$205,358,737

Now there were other similarities as well, including the main Secret Service character's military background etc. But you get the picture or pictures. If you visit the wikipedia pages for each film you'll note that each spec script was purchased in March of 2012 (more or less the exact same time). There's no mention of whose script came first although the hint might the guy who got paid more - the one for White House Down earned $3 million. One gets the impression that someone else looked at the first script and decided - hey let's copy this entire concept and sell it to another studio. Another clue is that the second movie (or copycat) spent less than half as much money on their version (Olympus Has Fallen) and threw in some less than stellar leads (Aaron Eckhart and Gerard Butler as opposed to Channing Tatum and Jamie Foxx).

But things don't always work out that way. Back in the early 1990's you might recall the movie Tombstone came out before Wyatt Earp and for less money yet it scored more int he box office. It turns out that Kevin Costner was involved in the original project that became Tombstone but decided to make another version on his own (a bloated, super-expensive 3 hour movie that no one watched and led to his eventual downfall as Hollywood guru).

Olympus Has Fallen

Budget $70 million

$161,025,640

Also, in the 90's we were treated to an Asteroid Duel; Armageddon versus Deep Impact, and a volcano shoot-out; "Dante's Peak versus Volcano." On the kiddie movie side of things we got Antz versus a Bugs Life. In the 2000's we got the Illusionist versus the Prestige. And let's not forget the foreign ripoffs with The Grudge, The Ring, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo and Hunger Games (yes it's a ripoff - check out Battle Royale - a Japanese flick made before [in 2000] the Hunger Games books came out [first one published in 2008]).

So getting back to the original question; which one was better - White House Down or Olympus Has Fallen. In our humble opinion, after watching one right after the other (on pay per view last night) we'd have to say White House Down was more entertaining on several levels:

• Channing Tatum's performance had more depth to it.
• The cute kid in White House Down did a great job.
• There was more fun and humor in the action scenes, Olympus was pretty grim.
• James Woods - need we say more.
• There was the flag waving versus the flag falling (something we should have included in the table above) - the waving was cheerful versus the falling one being a bit somber.

Neither was particularly believable but that's ok - entertaining will do. But seriously, doesn't anyone get an F for cheating in Hollywood???


Copyright 2013, Raving Reviews


#RavingReviews
#WhiteHouseDown
#OlympusHasFallen

Read More

A Tribute to Tom Lehrer

Before Steve Martin or Richard Pryor, before George Carlin, before Bob Newhart and yes even before Lenny Bruce, there was Tom Lehrer. Lehrer began releasing comedy albums all the way back in 1953, even before the concept of the comedy album had really been established. But Tom wasn't your ordinary stand up comic - he was something so unique that quite frankly no one like him has ever appeared on the stage since.

Tom Lehrer was a comedian, a musician, a mathematician and even possibly a spy (for us) - but beyond all of that he was a wit the likes of which only appears once in a generation. The closest analogue we can think of today might be Steve Colbert - although Steve's songs don't quite compare to Tom's.

Tom Lehrer, the inventor of the Comedy album

Tom Lehrer went to Harvard, studied mathematics, worked at Los Alamos and later taught math at several universities. He ended his singing / comedy career in the early 1970's - rumor has it due to Henry Kissinger winning the Nobel peace prize. Another rumor states that Ricardo Montalban attacked him at a performance in San Francisco due to his "Vatican Song." It is clear that his comedy influenced all generations of comedians since but none has ever managed to reproduce the intellectualism and savvy he demonstrated.

This song really benefits from the visual aid...

Tom is still with us and lives in his retirement in beautiful Santa Cruz, CA (one of our favorite places) - he even taught at the University of California Santa Cruz - a combination of Math and Musical Theater (not in the same class of course). His last lecture concerned the nature of infinity - that's a hell of a way to make an exist.

One of the more biting satires of the Cold War

We will leave you with several more of Tom's ballads...

The elements song

Oedipus Rex

In Old Mexico

A fierce dig at the South during Segregation

Send the Marines...

Copyright 2013, Raving Reviews 

#RavingReviews
#TomLehrer

Read More

Homeland Insecurity

To say the United States has lived in a cocoon of paranoid over-reaction for the past decade or so is perhaps an understatement. What 9/11 really seemed to accomplish more than anything was to give credence and deference to media-fueled mass hysteria. There was no logic or reason to how this country reacted to that tragedy. On the one hand we launched several ill-considered wars which when combined now represent the longest conflict in American history. But that wasn't all; we also managed to gut the constitution in what now seems almost a whim (the very rushed Patriot Act). This is all the more remarkable given that throughout the entire Cold War when the world was a heartbeat away from total nuclear destruction, we somehow managed to preserve, protect and even cherish our freedoms.

Homeland Security came into existence two years after 9/11

The latest headlines can attest to the fact that we're doing more spying now than we ever have before - even more than during the Cold War. People don't seem to question the motives or rationale behind this unprecedented level of paranoia - but they should. Let's put this into perspective; every year more than 10x as many Americans die from gunshot wounds (self inflicted or otherwise) as did during 9/11. Put another way, in one year more Americans will die from guns here at home than died in both the entire Afghan and Iraq wars combined.

Like I said, there's no logic to what's been going on here - its more or less crazy...

Season 3 has taken Homeland in new directions

Crazy, like say, Claire Danes' character in Homeland. Homeland is a Showtime series which is in its 3rd season now. Up until this season it was something we only watched while traveling - where hotels only had Showtime and Showtime kept rerunning these episodes over and over again so you really couldn't miss it. We didn't like it during season one or two and part of the reason was the principle of the thing. It seemed like a combination of the most paranoid theme of the Cold War (The Manchurian Candidate) combined with all the worst aspects of the god-awful Fox series, 24. It was about as much fun to watch as getting the Rapiscan at airport security.

But then something changed this year. The show shifted from its terrorist paranoia to a deeper focus on the Intelligence Community in general and began highlighting many of the secondary characters. More than that, though - the plot began to focus more and more on Carrie Matheson's (Danes) inability to separate mental illness from intelligence practice. This has proven much more entertaining on many levels. It allows the show to poke criticism at itself and the larger sense of national paranoia while still shifting more towards a traditional spy thriller format. Another key aspect to this season's success was the decision to put Brody (Damien Lewis - you remember him, he played the straight-laced hero Captain Winters in HBO's Band of Brothers) on the back burner. Brody in this series, is the Manchurian Candidate and quite frankly he didn't play role so well anyway. We've had two movie versions of the Manchurian Candidate and in the first one Frank Sinatra (who wasn't the candidate) was the star and in the second Denzel Washington was (although Liev Shrieber playing the candidate did a good job).

Danes, Lewis, Baccarin and Patinkin

Lewis, while a competent actor, doesn't have great range and when he does try to break out of his normal character he comes across as though he is struggling a bit. Claire Danes on the other is perfectly convincing as both a desperate agent needing to be heard and as a stark raving looney - she's got range.

Rounding out the cast this year are Mandy Patinkin, Morena Baccarin and F. Murray Abraham (yes, that guy from the Mozart movie - Salieri). All of these folks are simply stellar; Mandy Patinkin is one of the best character actors in the business and Morena helped make Firefly the classic that it's become. All in all, Homeland seems to have done a very effective job of reinventing itself this season - becoming a much more reasonable drama.

The question is; will the U.S. do the same? (and someday emerge from this collective paranoia)



Copyright 2013, Raving Reviews

#Homeland
#RavingReviews

Read More